I recently returned from a
Chinese Mental Health Summit in
Many of our hosts admitted that the
professional field of psychology in
Fast Forward to 2009.
It was a little nerve-wracking for us to discover that what were billed in the programs as “roundtable discussions” or “ informal panel discussions” turned out to be jam-packed occasions often numbering well over 100 audience members. My vision of cozy, interactive dialogue evaporated. Nonetheless, we were honored that so many would be interested in our presentations.
My afternoon didactic covered Clinical work with Anxiety Disorders, primarily using a cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) approach, and including case examples and discussions of Chinese American clients. My audience was engaged, polite, intelligent. They were patient with my rather limited Mandarin vocabulary, and fascinated by the notion of psychotherapy in general.
Yet we had a serious divergence. Before getting into psychotherapy, I emphasized the importance of confidentiality. I explained how the case examples I presented were all composite characters or contained disguised personal traits – for the protection of client privacy.
“Confidentiality”, I explained “is a basic right necessary for psychotherapy. It is essential that a person feels completely safe to disclose their emotions and pressures if we are to address deep rooted issues.”
Their expressions were stunned when I explained that if I, the psychotherapist, violated client confidentiality – I would be liable for potential jail time and huge financial fines. Doctoral degree or not, I was responsible even to a peasant or laborer. Silence. I added that of course, there were exceptions for true emergencies such as dangerous psychiatric crises, or abuse of children. Puzzled looks.
My audience was not opposed to the concept of confidentiality. But they were understandably flustered. They were ambitious learners who wanted to practice psychotherapy and help others. Was I implying that they’d be unable to do so within their current framework?
So this, is my current mental knot. I believe that practices such as confidentiality, child abuse reporting, patients’ rights and clinician accountability are essential to doing this work safely and effectively.
Is psychotherapy as I understand
and practice it (in line with the ethical codes of conduct taught by American
graduate schools and upheld by the American Psychological Association),
possible in a country that does not provide a right to privacy? I do no believe that the desire for privacy
is solely a Western phenomenon. I have
had numerous clients hailing from Asia who expressed their relief upon learning
about strict
They say things like:
“This has been so helpful, but I would never
do it in
“We would never have brought our son for treatment if we thought people/institutions could find out.”
It’s a culturally biased conceit to
think that
I mean, we are talking about a place where I was unable to access simple sites such as facebook or Youtube. Could I, or any Chinese citizen, come to trust that personal health information would be uncensored and unrevealed?
Good job for doing this! It must have been such an eye opener and a rewarding experience.
Mina
Posted by: Mina | 11/19/2009 at 07:32 AM
Calling privacy a cultural trait is like saying misogyny is a cultural trait. Some have called me "Americanized" to adopt the ideals of ethical behavior... but I do believe that there are truths in life. One's right to privacy is one. I think the definition and boundary of privacy can be discussed, but the fact that it's a human need and right is clear to me.
Posted by: Pei | 11/19/2009 at 08:52 AM
Thanks for commenting! I agree Pei that many values and rights can not be excused as mere cultural quirks. I always talk with my graduate students about our challenge: to balance respect for clients' cultures and beliefs without becoming total cultural relativists who excuse/accept any behavior.
Posted by: Dr. Hsu | 11/27/2009 at 03:25 PM